CPAP/BiPAP Lawsuits

Thousands of plaintiffs have joined the CPAP Multi-District Litigation. The lawsuits are primarily taking place in a Pennsylvania federal court.

THIS IS A FREE SERVICE

Maximum Compensated Form Damages!

  • CPAP/BiPAP Lawsuit

Last Update

  • July 12, 2023

CPAP Lawsuit Updates

Nearly 800 CPAP Lawsuits Filed

More CPAP cases are being added each month. The total number of cases is nearly 800 in total. Around 15 new cases are filed each month, which is less than this past summer.

12/2/23

CPAP Case Deadlines Established

A number of important deadlines have been established by the court in the CPAP class action lawsuit. One of the more important deadlines is that the settlement mediator must report the status of the mediations to the Court on February 16, 2024. Another important date to remember is the Conclusion of general causation fact discovery on April 30, 2024. There is a potential Daubert motions hearing on March 20, 2025, for general causation. This hearing may also take place on April 20, 2025, depending on the Court’s schedule.

11/29/23

More Recalls Announced by Philips

Philips announced even more recalls. This recall included the V60 and V60 Plus Ventilators they produce. The FDA stated that these two products do not meet the minimum standards and should be pulled from the shelves. The offending parts include the Power Management Printed Circuit Board Assemblies. This is yet another setback for Philips.


10/23/23

Update on CPAP Consumer Class Action Settlement Claims

In the CPAP class action settlement, Philips will pay at least $479 million. Compensation, between $56 to $1,552, plus an extra $100 for returned devices, is for individuals and insurers affected by the recall. The settlement awaits final approval on April 11, 2024, with plaintiffs' lawyers seeking $95 million for fees and costs. This is separate from ongoing personal injury and wrongful death suits related to CPAP machines.


10/12/23

Settlement for Philips CPAP Case

Koninklijke Philips will pay at least $479 million to settle part of the litigation from its 2021 recall of sleep apnea machines. This settlement does not affect the injury and wrongful death cases our firm is handling. Philips CEO anticipates resolving these cases next year, following the settlement of economic loss claims this year. Analysts predict Philips could face up to $4.5 billion in settlements for personal injury lawsuits linked to the recalled devices.

9/7/23

Stay Up To Date! Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Stay up-to-date on the latest class action news, settlement amounts and what you could qualify for.

About CPAP/BiPAP Lawsuits

What is this Lawsuit About?

Philips CPAP machines are used by people all over the U.S. to help with sleep issues such as sleep apnea. Lawsuits have been filed, citing issues with the device itself. Plaintiffs claim that Philips CPAP machines are linked to various types of cancer and illnesses. The lawsuits allege that the company knew of the potential risk of cancer and health issues because the injuries were directly reported to them. It’s further alleged that Philips did not warn the public of the harm their products were causing. Victims experienced injuries such as cancer, organ damage, sinus infection, headaches, and more.

The issue with the products stems from the design, which uses polyester-based polyurethane, or PE-PUR. This type of foam tends to degrade and may cause cancer and other illnesses. There have been nearly 100,000 reports to the FDA regarding PE-PUR foam in less than two years. There have also been 346 deaths associated with degrading PE-PUR foam. A complaint has been filed stating that Philips was well-informed that their products could cause serious harm and death in some cases and refused to warn the public. Further, Philips attempted to shift the blame to another company called SoClean, stating that the foam degradation in their products was due to ozone-cleaning machine use.

How to Know if You Qualify for the CPAP Lawsuit?

Anyone filing a CPAP lawsuit must meet certain requirements in order to file against Philips. Here are the qualifications:

  1. 1. Plaintiffs must have used either the Philips CPAP, BiLevel CPAP, or ventilator; and
  2. 2. Must have been diagnosed with certain cancers or other illnesses.
  3. 3. There are specific requirements for those who have been diagnosed with lung cancer and have a history of smoking.

Most of the lawsuits filed allege that plaintiffs developed certain types of cancers or respiratory illnesses. The cancers that allow plaintiffs to qualify for the lawsuit include oral, lung, oropharynx, nasal cavity or sinus, salivary, larynx, or hypopharynx cancers. They must be diagnosed with one of the cancers from this list to qualify for the lawsuit.

The respiratory illnesses that plaintiffs can use to qualify include pneumonitis, asthma, sarcoidosis, pulmonary fibrosis, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Potential plaintiffs must have used a listed Philips product and developed one of the cancers or respiratory injuries mentioned above to qualify for the CPAP lawsuit.

Which Sleep Apnea Machines Were Recalled?

Philips, a leading producer of sleep apnea equipment, issued a safety recall for approximately 3.5 million existing CPAP and BiPAP devices. Here's a list of the recalled models:

  • DreamStation ASV
  • SystemOne ASV4
  • SystemOne (Q Series)
  • DreamStation BiPAP
  • Dorma 500 CPAP
  • Garbin Plus
  • A-Series BiPAP
  • DreamStation ST
  • C Series ASV
  • DreamStation CPAP
  • DreamStation Go
  • REMStar SE Auto CPAP
  • Aeris
  • AVAPS
  • OmniLab Advanced Plus
  • Dorma 400
  • Triology 100 and 200
  • LifeVent
  • Other Philips devices

Is there a CPAP Class Action or MDL?

In the wake of the Philips CPAP recall, hundreds of lawsuits have been filed alleging injuries and financial loses attributable to CPAP machines. To manage the complexities of hundreds of lawsuits, courts have consolidated most cases into a single, central action known as multi-district litigation (MDL) in Pennsylvania. This “MDL” acts as a one-stop shop for legal proceedings and allows hundreds of Plaintiffs to streamline discovery, and prevents repetitive efforts.
Within the MDL, there are multiple proposed class action claims. These group together plaintiffs who have similar claims, usually focused on economic damages like replacement costs for medical devices or medical expenses. If a court certifies a class action, one trial can represent the entire group, which saves time and resources for Plaintiffs, the Defendant, and the Court. However, each proposed class action must meet specific legal requirements in order to be certified.
So, an MDL is an overarching umbrella, streamlining hundreds of cases related to the Philips CPAP recall, while the class actions within the MDL allow for efficient resolution of similar claims among groups of similar plaintiffs. This approach aims to resolve the open legal issues fairly and quickly.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

fre-ques

In defective CPAP machine lawsuits, plaintiffs may receive compensation for medical costs, lost wages, pain, and suffering, with potential punitive damages for Philips' negligence. Compensation varies based on individual health impacts and may cover ongoing medical costs. The process usually involves negotiation between plaintiffs' lawyers and Philips, with settlements or judgments reflecting economic and non-economic damages. The outcome is influenced by case precedents, evidence strength, and legal negotiation skills.

Philips has agreed to a minimum $479 million settlement for class action claims related to its recalled CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices. This agreement compensates for economic losses due to the recall, caused by degrading foam potentially releasing harmful substances. A federal judge has given initial approval, marking progress in the litigation over Philips' sleep apnea devices. The settlement provides compensation for hazards and the impact on device value and functionality, with eligible consumers potentially receiving payouts.

Philips' defense against CPAP litigation centers on minimizing harm and arguing against individual claims. They offer repair or replacement for affected devices, address lack of direct injury for economic loss claims, and challenge the link between foam degradation and specific health problems. Additionally, they emphasize swift recall action and ongoing research into potential health risks.

While you do not technically need a lawyer, it is highly recommended that you hire an experienced law firm to help you navigate the complexities of the lawsuit and gather evidence so you can maximize your potential compensation.