Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

Hair relaxer lawsuits have been filed in all 50 states by thousands of claimants due to cancers and other illnesses caused by hair relaxer products.

THIS IS A FREE SERVICE

Maximum Compensated Form Damages!

  • Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

Last Update

  • July 12, 2023

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Updates

Nearly 8,000 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Filed

In recent months, there has been a significant increase in the number of cases in the hair relaxer class action Multi-District Litigation (MDL). Throughout the summer and beyond, the MDL saw the addition of several thousand new cases each month. However, this rapid expansion experienced a sudden slowdown last month, with only 17 new cases being filed. As it stands, the MDL currently has a total of 7,894 pending cases.

12/18/23

Study Finds Strong Link Between Chemical Hair Relaxers and Uterine Cancer

This month, Boston University's Black Women's Health Study released the findings of an extensive study that began in 1995, involving the health records of nearly 60,000 Black women. The study revealed that those who had used chemical hair relaxers for a long period showed a notably higher incidence of uterine cancer. These results reinforce previous findings from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which indicated a distinct link between the use of hair relaxers and cancer. In response to these findings, the FDA recently proposed a new regulation aiming to prohibit the use of formaldehyde in all hair relaxer products.

10/19/23

Plaintiffs Filed Master Complaint

The plaintiffs have filed their master complaint, which is an impressively thorough and detailed document. Spanning over 400 pages, it meticulously outlines the allegations made by the plaintiffs.

8/18/23

Revlon Bankruptcy Update

Revlon provided an update to the MDL judge on their bankruptcy proceedings and responded to the plaintiffs’ June 30, 2023, status report. Despite its bankruptcy, Revlon's substantial insurance policy is notable for potentially covering hair relaxer cancer claims. Revlon asserts that claims must follow the bankruptcy court’s procedures, with a filing deadline of September 14, 2023. Claims not covered by insurance will be discharged in bankruptcy. Revlon has filed objections to around 3,000 hair straightening claims and criticized the plaintiffs’ lawyers for misrepresenting the bankruptcy process.

7/5/23
How to Know if You Qualify for the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

Hair relaxer lawsuits have been brought by thousands of claimants. Studies have shown a relationship between chemical hair straighteners and certain types of cancers. These cancers include ovarian, uterine, and breast cancers. Victims have experienced illnesses due to hair relaxer usage. A new study has reported a direct correlation between these products and an increase in cancer diagnosis. Women who use certain hair relaxers are more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer.
Many big-name companies, such as L’Oreal, are being sued due to the potential harm their products have caused to many women. The lawsuit alleges that hair relaxer products contain chemicals that may cause uterine cancer. Hair relaxer products are predominately used by African-American women.
Hair relaxer products contain many endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). These chemicals may enter the body when used on the scalp and can alter hormone levels. Using these products may lead to many health issues, such as endometriosis and different cancer types. The chemical can also harm the immune system and cause ovarian cancer. Hair relaxer products contain another harmful chemical known as phthalates, which may cause issues with natural hormone production.

What is The Difference Between Class Action Lawsuits and Multi-District Litigation (MDL)?

Class actions and multi-district litigation (MDL) are both legal mechanisms used to handle a large number of lawsuits that share common issues, but they operate differently.
In a class action lawsuit, a small group of plaintiffs represent a larger group, or class, against a defendant. This method is efficient when individual lawsuits would be impractical due to the large number of plaintiffs. The outcome of a class action suit, whether it's a court decision or a settlement, applies to all class members, unless they opt out, if permitted by the court.
On the other hand, MDL consolidates individual but related civil cases from different federal districts into a single district for pretrial proceedings. This process is often used in complex cases like product liability suits. Unlike class actions, in MDL, each plaintiff retains their individual lawsuit, and outcomes or settlements are handled individually, even though the pretrial process is combined.

Why Are the Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Consolidated Into a MDL?

The hair relaxer lawsuits are an MDL, not a class action, because the varied injuries, potential contributing factors, and unique medical histories of each plaintiff necessitate a more flexible approach. This allows for individualized assessments of damages, liability arguments based on specific cases, and tailored discovery while still achieving efficiency through shared pre-trial procedures. Think of it as a legal buffet where everyone benefits from streamlined prep work but chooses their own unique dish based on their needs.

How to Qualify for the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

To qualify for the hair relaxer lawsuit, individuals must meet specific criteria related to the use of certain hair relaxer products and subsequent development of certain cancers:
Qualifying Injuries:

  • Uterine Cancer
  • Endometrial Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • & Other Qualifying Cancers

  • Hair Relaxer Products Linked:
  • Dark & Lovely
  • Just for Me
  • Motions
  • Africa's Best
  • African Pride
  • Bantu
  • Luster's
  • Mizani Rhelaxer
  • TCB or TCB Naturalse
  • Ultra Precise/li>
  • Ultra Sheen Supreme
  • Elite Bristo
  • Optimum
  • Soft & Beautiful

To establish eligibility for participation in the hair relaxer lawsuit, claimants must provide concrete evidence of their use of one or more of the specified hair relaxer products. This documentation can include purchase receipts, photographs, or testimonies that clearly demonstrate a history of using these products. Additionally, claimants must have a medically confirmed diagnosis of one of the specified cancers: Uterine Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, or Ovarian Cancer. Medical records, such as diagnostic reports, treatment records, and statements from healthcare professionals, are crucial in substantiating this aspect of the claim. The combination of proof of product usage and a relevant medical diagnosis forms the cornerstone of establishing a direct link required for eligibility in this lawsuit. It is this connection that underpins the legal argument that the use of these hair relaxer products may have contributed to the development of the cancer, thereby making the individual a potential claimant in the lawsuit.

What Brands Are Being Investigated in the Hair Relaxer Product Litigation?

Several manufacturers and their respective products are commonly implicated in many hair relaxer lawsuits, including:

  • L’Oreal - manufacturer of Dark & Lovely, Ultra Sheen, and other chemical hair products
  • Strength of Nature Global, LLC - manufacturer of Motions;
  • Namaste, LLC - manufacturer of ORS Olive Oil Hair Relaxer; and
  • TCB Naturals/Godrej Consumer Products - manufacturer of Just For Me.
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

    fre-ques

    The hair relaxer lawsuits allege that companies, including L’Oréal, failed to warn consumers about the risks of their products, leading to health issues like uterine cancer from chemicals like phthalates. The lawsuits argue that the companies knew of these dangers but continued to sell the products, prioritizing profit over consumer safety and neglecting their duty to inform users about potential carcinogens.

    Yes, the hair relaxer lawsuits highlight that these products were predominantly marketed to Black women, underscoring concerns about their disproportionate exposure to potentially harmful chemicals. This focus sheds light on issues of race, health, and corporate responsibility, suggesting that the marketing to Black women overlooked their specific health risks. The case emphasizes the importance of inclusivity and safety in product development and marketing, raising broader questions about health equity and the ethical responsibilities of personal care companies.

    Several chemicals found in hair relaxer products are suspected to be carcinogenic, raising concerns about their potential health risks. These include:
    • Formaldehyde: Often used in hair products for its preservative and straightening properties, formaldehyde has been classified as a carcinogen.
    • Parabens: Commonly used as preservatives in cosmetics, parabens can mimic estrogen and have been linked to cancer risk.
    • Heavy Metals: Certain hair relaxers contain heavy metals, which, with prolonged exposure, can have toxic effects and potentially contribute to cancer development.
    • Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals like Phthalates: These chemicals, found in many personal care products, can interfere with hormone function and are linked to various health issues, including cancer.

    Chemical relaxers, often used by individuals with natural hair, can lead to a variety of side effects. These range from relatively minor issues like dandruff and hair loss to more serious conditions such as endometriosis and cancer. Currently, there are no available hair straightening products that offer a permanent solution and are entirely chemical-free.